By the time of his death in 1954, Sutherland's cranial concepts were firmly established. Today, the Sutherland Cranial Teaching Foundation (formed in 1953 to carry on Sutherland's work and to maintain the ‘purity of the concept') and The Cranial Academy are the major organizations teaching osteopathic cranial courses in the
In addition to the two cranial organizations mentioned above, there are currently four other large organizations - and a number of smaller ones - teaching workshops based on Sutherland's cranial concepts, but not necessarily using his techniques.
The largest of these, the Upledger Institute, was founded by John Upledger, an osteopath who became aware of dural membrane movement (Sutherland's ‘Primary Respiratory Mechanism') while assisting in surgery in 1971. Upledger (1983, pp. 2-3) describes this as his first awareness of the PRM. (Sutherland had described the PRM in 1939; see also Magoun, Sr., 1966). Upledger later attended a
The other three large organizations are chiropractic. All conduct workshops internationally and have strong certification programs.
The first is Sacro Occipital Resource Society International (SORSI). This organization was established in 1957 to promote the work of Major Bertrand De Jarnette, D.O., D.C., the founder of Sacro Occipital Technique (SOT). De Jarnette studied with Sutherland and accepted his cranial concepts, but approached diagnosis and treatment from a different perspective. His extensive research on the relationships between the occiput and the sacrum dates back to the 30's, and he began a cranial teaching program in 1968. SORSI cranial workshops are open only to physicians.
Sacro Occipital Technique Organization (SOTO-USA) is a newer organization, founded in 1999. It also promotes the concepts and treatment protocols of De Jarnette. SOTO-USA is very active in the presentation of cranial workshops. This organization stresses research and strives to upgrade the quality of education available to SOT practitioners. However, both organizations share many of the same presenters and instructors.
The International College of Applied Kinesiology (ICAK) is the other large chiropractic organization teaching cranial techniques. It was formed to contribute to and expand on the research of George Goodheart, D.C. Acknowledging the cranial concepts of Sutherland and the craniosacral mechanism, Goodheart uses the techniques of Applied Kinesiology (which he developed) in the diagnosis and treatment of cranial dysfunctions, but confines AK cranial techniques to cranial bone and sutural releases. Sphenobasilar synchondrosis (SBS) patterns are not directly addressed. Like SORSI and SOTO-USA, both Dr. Goodheart and the ICAK have worldwide followings, and their workshops are also open only to physicians.
Numerous professional schools and smaller organizations provide cranial workshops for healthcare practitioners; they are found throughout the
Hancock CranioSomatic Institute - G. Dallas Hancock, Ph.D.(c)., D.C., L.M.T. and Flo Barber, Ph.D.(c), L.M.T.
Dr. Dallas Hancock has combined osteopathic cranial techniques, SOT, and Applied Kinesiology in his clinical practice since his graduation from
His diversified studies and unique background have allowed him to develop important new diagnostic and treatment procedures in cranial therapy. He founded the National Institute of Craniosacral Studies (NICS) in 1988 to teach the new cranial techniques he had developed. That organization has since been replaced by the Hancock CranioSomatic Institute, which he formed with his wife, Flo Barber. The numerous techniques developed by Dr. Hancock focus on releasing Primary cranial restrictions to restore normal neuromusculoskeletal function. His therapy is highly structural in its intent, procedures and outcomes, and relates specific cranial functions / dysfunctions to somatic functions / dysfunctions. Dr. Hancock has been presenting lectures and workshops in alternative therapies since 1974 and has maintained his holistic clinical practice in
The evolution of cranial manipulative techniques into a therapeutic modality as we know them, may have originated in the
The first use of cranial manipulation as a therapeutic modality, according to Cottam and Smith (1981), was by Willard Carver, D.C., who reportedly used a technique on the head in 1906 for treating hydrocephalus. Cottam and Smith stated that Carver (1909), in his book Chiropractic Analysis, made two statements that seemed to refer to cranial manipulation for the treatment of hydrocephalus and ‘Brain Fever'. However, he did not describe the technique in writing.
During the teens and early twenties the discovery and use of cranial manipulative techniques was limited to a few isolated osteopaths and chiropractors using a variety of procedures, such as pressure, vibration, and manual thrusting. Many osteopaths and chiropractors shared knowledge in those early days, leaving the origin of different techniques open to debate. However, records are available to show that two doctors - first
In the mid-twenties, Dr. Nephi Cottam discovered the power and effectiveness of cranial manipulation when he performed a cephalad lift on the cranial vault of a seated patient. This procedure provided immediate relief to the woman, who had been hysterically running around screaming, pulling her hair, tearing her clothes, and destroying furnishings for three days (Calvin Cottam, 1990). Eight days later he performed a similar procedure on a young woman who had not been able to sleep for three months without opiates. She had lost her eyesight and hearing and was near death. After Cottam performed a cranial release the patient lapsed into normal sleep and soon recovered (Cottam did not elaborate on how long ‘soon' was). These successes impressed Cottam enough that he began to research cranial manipulative techniques on his patients and later to teach his techniques to others.
Cottam's techniques were spread across the
Dr. Sutherland's developmental contributions to cranial technique were not inspired by chance spectacular results; his cranial research was the result of what he later described as a ‘guiding thought' which occurred to him in 1899 as he stood before an osteopathic school display case viewing a disarticulated skull. The bones had been positioned in their normal anatomical relationships, but were slightly separated to allow observation of the individual bones. Dr. Sutherland later wrote, “…my attention was called to the beveled articular surfaces of the sphenoid bone. Suddenly there came a thought - I call it a guiding thought - ‘beveled, like the gills of a fish, indicating articular mobility for a respiratory mechanism.' '' (A. S. Sutherland, 1962, p. 12). The thought that cranial bones had articular motion nagged him until the mid-1920's, at which time he resolved to settle the issue once and for all. This turned into a long and complex task.
Sutherland spent years methodically studying the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the cranial bones. By experimenting on himself, and later applying his findings to the treatment of others, he proved not only that the cranial bones were capable of articular mobility, but that they were in both constant motion and acting under the control of a guiding reciprocal tension membrane. The osteopathic profession was slow to accept Sutherland's cranial concepts. A. S. Sutherland (1962, p. 64) describes the professional response to his first introduction of his work at a convention in 1929 as ‘no response' and ‘a dud.' His presentation at a 1932 American Osteopathic Association (AOA) convention was attended by only seven people. His articles, which appeared in two professional periodicals, The Northwest Bulletin and The Osteopathic Profession between 1931 and 1939, generated scant interest.
Sutherland's contribution to the cranial field was an elaborate unified system, the ‘Primary Respiratory Mechanism', which he described in his book, The Cranial Bowl, published in 1939. The book sold poorly, and an invitation to discuss The Cranial Bowl at an osteopathic convention in 1940 was even canceled due to the protests of doctors who were opposed to the inclusion of cranial in their conference (A.S. Sutherland, 1962, pp. 72-73).
The turning point for Sutherland's work came in 1942 when he was invited to present his cranial concept to a group of six outstanding osteopathic physicians immediately prior to the annual AOA convention in
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cottam, C. (1990). Cranial and Facial Adjusting: Sources, References, Index (Vol. 2).
Cottam, C., & Smith, E. (1981). Roots of Cranial Manipulation. Chiropractic History, 1(1), 31-34.
Cottam, N. (1963). The Story of Craniopathy.
De Jarnette, M. B. (1979). Cranial Technique 1979 - 1980.
Kimberly, P. (1987). History of Cranial Osteopathy. In E. W. Retzlaff & F. L. J. Mitchell (Eds.), The Cranium and Its Sutures (pp. 59 - 67).
Ligeros, K. A. (1937). How Ancient Healing Governs Modern Therapeutics.
Magoun, H. I., Sr. (1966). Osteopathy in the Cranial Field (1st ed.).
Magoun, H. I., Sr. (Ed.). (1976). Osteopathy in the Cranial Field (3rd ed.).
Sutherland, A. S. (1962). With Thinking Fingers.
Sutherland, W. G. (1939). The Cranial Bowl.
Upledger, J. E., Vredevoogd, J. D. (1983). Craniosacral Therapy.
Walther, D. S. (1983). Applied Kinesiology, Volume II.
Back to About Cranial Therapy ..